Next-gen intake-to-pay at enterprise scale
Legacy P2P hasn’t kept up. Zip’s intake-first approach delivers efficiency and transparency from initial request to payment.
.webp)
.webp)
.webp)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
.svg)
Modern procurement demands more. Zip delivers.
The legacy way
Procurement blackholes
Time-consuming AP
Siloed systems
The Zip way
Stakeholder transparency
Streamlined AP operations
Native connectivity
We’ve learned to be more proactive with managing our vendors, and we are continuing to automate and simplify for end users. Building [intake-to-pay] end-to-end with Zip has really simplified that for our end users.
.webp)
Compare Zip vs. Coupa
%20(1).svg)
Modern user experience
End-to-end requester visibility
Pre-built integrations
Policy-based dynamic intake
Out-of-the-box OCR accuracy
Gen-AI invoice coding
Unified supplier management experience
Intuitive supplier portal
Self-service administration
Unified code base
Compared with our old system, it’s night and day in terms of experience and ease of use. Employees love the transparency and visibility—especially our cross-functional teams.
Zip led Northwestern Mutual to an 18% cost savings
More reasons leading companies chose Zip over Coupa
No-code workflows
Create and modify workflows effortlessly with Zip's simple drag-and-drop interface.
Robust supplier onboarding
Proactively collect data from suppliers and stakeholders for smarter decisions.
Zip AI
Leverage AI to automate tasks, enhance decision-making, and extract insights.
Global payments
Automate supplier payments across 140+ countries and 40+ currencies.
Native integration platform
Easily build integrations between Zip and any third-party system in your tech stack.
Comprehensive reporting
Gain real-time spend and process visibility with Zip’s dashboards and reports.
Don’t let your legacy P2P system hold you back
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between Zip and Coupa for enterprise procurement?
The primary difference between Zip vs. Coupa for enterprise procurement is that Zip takes an orchestration-centric approach to procurement. By incorporating comprehensive intake and orchestration with procure-to-pay, Zip offers a full end-to-end procurement solution designed for modern enterprise needs.
What integration capabilities does Zip offer compared to Coupa?
Compared to Coupa, Zip offers more integration options including out-of-the-box connectors, a native low-code integration platform, flat file integration, and APIs for fully custom integrations. These options make Zip a powerful Coupa alternative for businesses with diverse tech stacks.
How do Zip vs Coupa compare in terms of implementation time and complexity?
In general, Zip provides faster time to value vs. Coupa. With a team of in-house deployment experts and a streamlined implementation methodology, customers can get up and running with Zip quickly and without the complexity often associated with Coupa deployments.
What ROI can enterprise businesses expect when choosing between Zip and Coupa?
Zip vs. Coupa comparisons indicate that Zip delivers significant value, including improved policy adoption, increased spend under management, and greater cross-functional transparency. These benefits translate to more spend control and efficiency for every team involved.
Zip vs. Coupa: Which platform is more cost-effective?
Zip is widely regarded as the more cost-effective Coupa alternative, offering lower total cost of ownership (TCO). Zip’s self-service capabilities reduce reliance on dedicated resources, and its out-of-the-box functionality eliminates the need for costly customizations.
Why is Zip the best Coupa alternative for business?
As the pioneer of the intake and orchestration category, Zip is the leading Coupa alternative because it offers comprehensive intake-to-pay procurement management within a single platform. Zip is designed to meet the evolving needs of today’s business by ensuring seamless procurement processes and a future-proof platform.